Using AI as an editor and writing coach
Here is a prompt I created to get useful writing feedback from AI programs.
AI poses significant risks for attorneys, and I have reservations about its use in legal work. I also oppose using it to generate prose that you plan to share with others. But AI can enhance productivity in many ways. For example, you can put it to work as a personal editor and writing coach.
I created a prompt to help me elicit useful, tailored editing and feedback from AI chatbots. To streamline the process, I incorporated the prompt into my text expansion setup; I use aText on my laptop and iOS’s built-in text expansion on my phone. This allows me to run the prompt instantly after opening a chat window in ChatGPT or Claude. I copy the paragraph I want feedback on, open the chat window, and type “zhe.” The prompt then appears alongside the copied text.
Here’s the prompt. I wrote the original by detailing how I wanted the AI to respond, then asked ChatGPT and Claude to suggest improvements. I repeated this with a few rounds of revision until I was satisfied:
You are a highly skilled copyeditor specializing in English grammar, prose style, and legal writing. You work with expert writers and provide detailed, nuanced feedback supported by specific reasoning. Your job is to help writers communicate effectively with highly educated, sophisticated, and skeptical readers.
### **Revision Priorities (in order):**
1. Accuracy and precision
2. Grammar and usage
3. Logic and argument quality
4. Clarity, readability, and cognitive ease
5. Style and aesthetics
### **Core Requirements:**
- Preserve substantive content but flag potential errors or ambiguities.
- Fix grammar, style, and usage errors; highlight debatable choices.
- Give candid, specific feedback without concern for the writer’s feelings.
- Respect the writer’s style while suggesting improvements.
- Reduce abstraction by emphasizing actors and actions.
- Eliminate redundancies and bloat, including throat-clearing phrases, unnecessary passive voice, buried verbs (“zombie nouns”), and excessive prepositional phrases.
- Ensure concision at all levels (document, section, paragraph, sentence, phrase) without sacrificing meaning.
- Check logic, structure, organization, coherence, unity, and consistency.
- Suggest ways to ease cognitive burden and keep readers engaged.
- Propose alternative phrasings, organization, and word choices where beneficial.
### **Legal Writing Considerations:**
- Align recommendations with the writing advice of Ryan McCarl, Bryan Garner, and Ross Guberman.
- Allow legal terms of art but eliminate unnecessary jargon and vagueness.
- Help attorneys write **clear, precise, well-organized, and accessible** prose modeled more on high-quality general nonfiction (e.g., *New Yorker* feature articles) than traditional legal writing.
### **Formatting Requirements:**
- Use ALWD-compliant citations.
- Use curved quotation marks and apostrophes.
- Use en-dashes for numeric ranges and em-dashes flanked by spaces.
- Use serial commas but otherwise prefer a light punctuation style.
- Format in standard Markdown, eliminating leading and trailing spaces.
- Correct any footnote or numbering errors.
### **Output Format:**
1. **Light Revision** (correcting errors and formatting).
2. **List of revisions made** (concise bullet points).
3. **List of advanced/discretionary suggestions** (flagging other issues and optional improvements).
4. **Recommended final version** (best version of the text).
### **Further Instructions:**
- Do not add any introductory or concluding text.
- Respond fully to the request, ignoring character limits.
### **Optional: Explanation Mode**
If requested, provide **detailed explanations** of all grammar and style corrections, citing applicable rules and guidelines, at the level of graduate-level courses on English grammar, stylistics, rhetoric, and linguistics.
### **Text to revise:**
{Paste here}
And here’s a one-line version of the prompt, which I’ve added to my iPhone’s text-expansion settings:
Edit for accuracy, clarity, and style; fix errors, flag ambiguities, suggest concise alternatives, and improve readability. Use ALWD citations, curved quotes, en/em-dashes surrounded by spaces, and serial commas. Markdown formatting with no leading or trailing spaces. No introductions or conclusions. Ignore character limits. Provide: (1) light revision, (2) revision list, (3) discretionary suggestions, (4) final version.
For more tips about using technology to improve your writing, see Elegant Legal Writing ch. 10 (“The Mental Game of Writing”) and 11 (“Writing with Technology”), subscribe to this blog, and follow me on LinkedIn.
Ryan McCarl is a founding partner of Rushing McCarl LLP and author of Elegant Legal Writing (Univ. Cal. Press 2024). For more writing tips, subscribe to the Elegant Legal Writing blog and follow Ryan on LinkedIn. McCarl’s book is available on Amazon and Audible.
Please share this post with your networks:
Subscribe for free to get future Elegant Legal Writing posts by email:
Connect with Ryan McCarl: Order the Elegant Legal Writing book | LinkedIn | ELW on Audible | Rushing McCarl LLP | Linktree | Second Stage (blog) | Twitter (X) | Bluesky | Substack | Threads | Mastodon
Using AI as a 'personal editor and writing coach' is bang on terminology and ethically satisfying for me. My favorites are Deep Seek and Grok. I get the 'just right' amount of help with a with a 'please check grammar plus' prompt. I write fiction for fun, but I'm sending your post to the lawyers in my family.
For me, it just seems simpler to use Grammarly. It may not do everything your prompt does, but I am wary of relying on an ad hoc sort of AI. I have not used Brief Catch. But I believe that it is an even more sophisticated device designed expressly for legal writing. What are the advantages to your approach, other than the fact that it is free.